Economic Stimulus, Freeways, Regional Transportation Plan, Transit Funding

Menu for the Bay Area Transportation Stimulus

Although we have yet to see a fully reconciled stimulus bill to come from Congress and President Obama, agencies across the nation are eagerly putting together their wish lists for how to spend their portion of the $800 billion-plus stimulus pie. Here in the Bay Area, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission has released a draft (PDF) explaining how it plans to allocate stimulus fund to transportation projects throughout the region.

Just how much money could the Bay Area get? It will not be exactly clear until the stimulus legislation is officially passed, but according to MTC’s current estimates, we could see $320-$500 million in FTA funds (sections 5307 and 5309), $140-$200 million Surface Transportation Program/FHWA funds, and $23 million (out of California’s $125 million total) for STP transportation enhancements. Moreover, California as a whole may receive $1.7-$2 billion in further FHWA funds, a chunk of which Caltrans and the California Transportation Commission would surely direct towards the Bay Area. Still further opportunities for funding might exist through other programs that have been weighed in the stimulus discussion, including the Senate’s $5.5 billion of competitive grants to be awarded at USDOT discretion, and the $2 billion allocation for designated high-speed rail corridors.

MTC intends to apply the money to a mixture of road and transit projects, some of which will be beneficial for the region, and some of which will not be. The exact allocation to specific projects will depend on the version of the bill Congress ultimately adopts, because different versions have not just different dollar amounts, but also include different “use it or lose it” provisions, which specify the timeline for applying funds. But here is the overall strategy:

  • “Shovel Ready” Projects: When time is of the essence and funds must be applied immediately, MTC will spend the money on “preservation” — that is, maintenance and repair — to the tune of $175-$355 million for transit and $97-$157 million for roads. Possible uses of the transit funds include preventive maintenance and vehicle repair/replacement, while road funds would be applied to resurfacing and pedestrian/bicycle improvements. Counties have provided lists of ready-to-go road and transit projects whose total price tag purposely exceeds the money anticipated to be available: $140 million for road projects and $420 million for transit. Transit funding would be allocated by formula between operators: Muni ($104.8 million), BART ($101.8 million), VTA ($73.5 million), AC Transit ($40.1 million), Caltrain ($16.1 million), Golden Gate District ($14.7 million), and SamTrans ($12.3 million).
  • System Expansion/Efficiency: Funds that need not be applied immediately would be directed toward closing funding gaps in MTC’s long-term plans, including Resolution 3434 transit expansion projects and the regional High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) lane network. (More information about these long-term plans can be found on the RTP page.) On the transit side, this includes a $70 million influx for the stalled Oakland Airport people mover, and $75 million for the subway station box in San Francisco’s Transbay Transit Center, which should ideally be constructed along with the Transit Center facility in the first phase. On the road side, a total of $43 million would fund a HOT interchange connector at Interstate 880/Route 237 in Milpitas, the Interstate 580 HOT lane in Alameda County, safety improvements to Vasco Road near Brentwood, and freeway ramp meters in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties.

Finally, still further funds are to be awarded at the discretion of both the state of California and the federal government, and these present further funding opportunities for the Bay Area. On the state end, this could fund Doyle Drive, pedestrian/bicycle improvements through the House’s transportation enhancements, and more Proposition 1B freeway widening projects — the Caldecott Tunnel fourth bore, as well as HOV lanes on Interstate 80 (Solano County), Interstate 580 (Alameda County), Highway 101 (Sonoma County). On the other hand, different federal programs could fund ferry vessels and the South San Francisco ferry terminal, Doyle Drive, Caltrain grade separations and electrification, and the Port of Oakland truck retrofit. High-speed rail funds could provide further funding for the Transbay train box, assuming they are incorporated into the final stimulus bill. Similarly, other funds still could be obtained through the competitive discretionary grants, if those are incorporated into the final bill.



4 thoughts on “Menu for the Bay Area Transportation Stimulus

  1. I really love your blog and all of the new things that have been added.

    Posted by felix | 9 February 2009, 4:29 am
  2. Thanks felix, glad to hear you’re enjoying it.

    Posted by Eric | 11 February 2009, 12:09 am


  1. Pingback: Stimulus Update: Details from the Final Package « Transbay Blog - 12 February 2009

  2. Pingback: Regional Proposal for the Bay Area Transportation Stimulus « Transbay Blog - 23 February 2009

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


RSS Feed Facebook Twitter Flickr

Archives by Month

Archives by Topic

Archives of all blog posts, organized by topics and themes. Click here for more.


Links to some of our favorite urbanist and transit blogs, websites, advocacy groups, news sources, and government agencies. Click here for more.

If you are interested in California water issues, you may want to check out my other blog on that topic.

Copyright © 2007-2021 Transbay Blog.
%d bloggers like this: