Central Subway, Community Meetings, Muni / SFMTA, San Francisco

Fall 2007 Central Subway Meetings

Over the next few weeks, the SFMTA will be holding a few public meetings on the Central Subway, a project which would extend the T-Third in a subway tunnel through South of Market and Union Square, terminating in Chinatown. Once the tunnel is completed, T-Third trains would proceed north from the 4th and King/Caltrain stop, rather than traveling around the Embarcadero to enter the Market Street subway, as they do now. The subway extension is only 1.7 miles long but is estimated to cost between $1.2 and 1.4 billion, an astronomical price tag to be partially covered by federal matching funds.

Despite the MTA’s gushing words of praise for the subway, the actual transit benefit that will be derived from this terribly expensive project is questionable. This is a topic that deserves fair and detailed treatment, so the Central Subway will be the subject of future posts. For now, though, I just want to encourage interested readers to attend one of the upcoming meetings, to voice concerns and learn more about the project:

Union Square/South of Market Community Meeting
Tuesday, October 30, 2007 (6:30 pm – 8:30 pm)
Pacific Energy Center
851 Howard Street (between 4th and 5th Streets)

Chinatown/North Beach Community Meeting
Thursday, November 8, 2007 (6:30 pm – 8:30 pm)
Gordon J. Lau Elementary School
950 Clay Street (between Stockton and Powell Streets)

Central Subway Community Advisory Group Meeting
Tuesday, November 13, 2007 (6:00 pm – 8:00 pm)
1 South Van Ness Avenue
Third Floor Conference Room

My usual offer applies: if anyone plans on attending one of these sessions and is interested in meeting up to talk transit over a beer or bite to eat after the meeting, feel free to drop me a line.



3 thoughts on “Fall 2007 Central Subway Meetings

  1. I think that although the central subway is very expensive, it is very necessary. The new project (with the tunnel going all the way to Washington Square Park) is a great improvement over the old project. But I do agree: it is way too short. It’s a start and a start is better than nothing.

    Posted by FS77 | 25 October 2007, 12:41 am
  2. The “new project” to Washington Square would be an extension of the current project (terminating in Chinatown), which is due for the federal matching funds.

    I certainly agree that transit improvements in the 30/45 corridor are very necessary — but that is not the same as saying that this subway, in its current form, is very necessary. There is a definite disconnect between the huge cost of this project and the not-as-huge benefit. But: more on that later.

    Posted by Eric | 25 October 2007, 12:54 am


  1. Pingback: A Series on the Central Subway « Transbay Blog - 13 November 2007

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


RSS Feed Facebook Twitter Flickr

Archives by Month

Archives by Topic

Archives of all blog posts, organized by topics and themes. Click here for more.


Links to some of our favorite urbanist and transit blogs, websites, advocacy groups, news sources, and government agencies. Click here for more.

If you are interested in California water issues, you may want to check out my other blog on that topic.

Copyright © 2007-2021 Transbay Blog.
%d bloggers like this: