<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commission Unveils Regional Plan for Transit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/</link>
	<description>Transportation and urban planning in the San Francisco Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:20:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyperlinear BART Map &#171; Burrito Justice</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hyperlinear BART Map &#171; Burrito Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] only we had such a dense network of metro lines to have to worry about such [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only we had such a dense network of metro lines to have to worry about such [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFCTA Moves Forward With Geary BRT Alternatives &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SFCTA Moves Forward With Geary BRT Alternatives &#171; Transbay Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and in the long term, it may make more sense to include Geary in the regional rail network with a BART line instead of Muni Metro. I suspect that there will be strong views on both sides as to whether the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and in the long term, it may make more sense to include Geary in the regional rail network with a BART line instead of Muni Metro. I suspect that there will be strong views on both sides as to whether the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridging the Divide &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bridging the Divide &#171; Transbay Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] paths.  Since this is long-term, the map includes hypothetical locations for stations on a new BART line &#8212; but it also includes new crosstown streetcar line between the Caltrain station and Market [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] paths.  Since this is long-term, the map includes hypothetical locations for stations on a new BART line &#8212; but it also includes new crosstown streetcar line between the Caltrain station and Market [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only thing worse than April Fools jokes is reading them several days after 04.01.  You had actually given me hope until I noticed /2009/04/01 in the address bar while reading the third paragraph.  *sniffles*

Sebastian]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing worse than April Fools jokes is reading them several days after 04.01.  You had actually given me hope until I noticed /2009/04/01 in the address bar while reading the third paragraph.  *sniffles*</p>
<p>Sebastian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@TOW: I nominate you :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TOW: I nominate you :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Overhead Wire</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Overhead Wire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You had me even though I knew it was coming!  Who&#039;s sending this to Steve Heminger?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had me even though I knew it was coming!  Who&#8217;s sending this to Steve Heminger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex: the purpose of the rapid bus is to replace MTC&#039;s proposed Oakland Airport Connector, which has a funding gap, and has been abandoned by the private partners who were supposed to cover much of the necessary funds. A bus solution is less glitzy, but more cost-effective. Glad to hear that you like the rest of the map, anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex: the purpose of the rapid bus is to replace MTC&#8217;s proposed Oakland Airport Connector, which has a funding gap, and has been abandoned by the private partners who were supposed to cover much of the necessary funds. A bus solution is less glitzy, but more cost-effective. Glad to hear that you like the rest of the map, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[damn... only thing in there that was lame was the oakland airport bus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn&#8230; only thing in there that was lame was the oakland airport bus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamison Wieser</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Wieser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You had me until the third paragraph where you mentioned disfavoring BART to San Jose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had me until the third paragraph where you mentioned disfavoring BART to San Jose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/04/01/commission-unveils-regional-plan-for-transit/#comment-7006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2944#comment-7006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet it would be popular. A GG Park station would require a spur off of this Geary line, but then it&#039;s also a pretty good shot south on 19th Ave. to Daly City. That would be another big project, but it seems like it could have a pretty revolutionary effect on transit share for the west side of town, linking to the L and N lines.

Thanks for the word on your blog, will be interested to check it out later.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet it would be popular. A GG Park station would require a spur off of this Geary line, but then it&#8217;s also a pretty good shot south on 19th Ave. to Daly City. That would be another big project, but it seems like it could have a pretty revolutionary effect on transit share for the west side of town, linking to the L and N lines.</p>
<p>Thanks for the word on your blog, will be interested to check it out later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

