<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Bay Area STA Funds for 2008-09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transbayblog.com/2009/02/23/update-bay-area-sta-funds-for-2008-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/02/23/update-bay-area-sta-funds-for-2008-09/</link>
	<description>Transportation and urban planning in the San Francisco Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Search of a Stable Equilibrium &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/02/23/update-bay-area-sta-funds-for-2008-09/#comment-7088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Search of a Stable Equilibrium &#171; Transbay Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2991#comment-7088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Search of a Stable&#160;Equilibrium  The elimination of State Transit Assistance (STA) funds in California has forced transit operators throughout [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search of a Stable&nbsp;Equilibrium  The elimination of State Transit Assistance (STA) funds in California has forced transit operators throughout [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where is the Transit Voice? &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/02/23/update-bay-area-sta-funds-for-2008-09/#comment-7030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Where is the Transit Voice? &#171; Transbay Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2991#comment-7030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] issues that particular affect transit riders? For instance: lobbying Sacramento to restore the missing State Transit Assistance funds, the operating money whose revocation lies at the core of Muni&#8217;s current deficit. We can only [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issues that particular affect transit riders? For instance: lobbying Sacramento to restore the missing State Transit Assistance funds, the operating money whose revocation lies at the core of Muni&#8217;s current deficit. We can only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shifting Funds, Shifty Priorities &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/02/23/update-bay-area-sta-funds-for-2008-09/#comment-6947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shifting Funds, Shifty Priorities &#171; Transbay Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2991#comment-6947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] transit operations; in the Bay Area, this means that local transit operators will lose access to over $55 million that they were relying upon for the remainder of this fiscal year, and no STA funding at all will [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] transit operations; in the Bay Area, this means that local transit operators will lose access to over $55 million that they were relying upon for the remainder of this fiscal year, and no STA funding at all will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The March to Berryessa &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/02/23/update-bay-area-sta-funds-for-2008-09/#comment-6670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The March to Berryessa &#171; Transbay Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2991#comment-6670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Transbay Blog      &#171; Update: Bay Area STA Funds for&#160;2008-09 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Transbay Blog      &laquo; Update: Bay Area STA Funds for&nbsp;2008-09 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/02/23/update-bay-area-sta-funds-for-2008-09/#comment-6654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Streetsblog &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2991#comment-6654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Transbay Blog Adds Up the STA Fund Losses to Bay Area Transit Agencies [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Transbay Blog Adds Up the STA Fund Losses to Bay Area Transit Agencies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Budget Deal Is Not A Deal For Transit &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/02/23/update-bay-area-sta-funds-for-2008-09/#comment-6650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Budget Deal Is Not A Deal For Transit &#171; Transbay Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2991#comment-6650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Budget Deal Is Not A Deal For&#160;Transit  UPDATE (23 February 2009): For updated figures on transit funding loss for FY2008-09, read this post. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Budget Deal Is Not A Deal For&nbsp;Transit  UPDATE (23 February 2009): For updated figures on transit funding loss for FY2008-09, read this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

