<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stimulus Update: Nadler&#8217;s Boost and the Senate Recovery Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transbayblog.com/2009/01/29/stimulus-update-nadlers-boost-and-the-senate-recovery-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/01/29/stimulus-update-nadlers-boost-and-the-senate-recovery-plan/</link>
	<description>Transportation and urban planning in the San Francisco Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squeezing the Sponge Dry &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/01/29/stimulus-update-nadlers-boost-and-the-senate-recovery-plan/#comment-6607</link>
		<dc:creator>Squeezing the Sponge Dry &#171; Transbay Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2600#comment-6607</guid>
		<description>[...] the House&#8217;s more generous (and more equitably distributed) transit funding solution post-Nadler would have been preferable, in that it would have provided additional investment for more local [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the House&#8217;s more generous (and more equitably distributed) transit funding solution post-Nadler would have been preferable, in that it would have provided additional investment for more local [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stimulus Update: Collins-Nelson Senate Compromise &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/01/29/stimulus-update-nadlers-boost-and-the-senate-recovery-plan/#comment-6579</link>
		<dc:creator>Stimulus Update: Collins-Nelson Senate Compromise &#171; Transbay Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2600#comment-6579</guid>
		<description>[...] passes? The funding priorities of the House and Senate versions exhibit marked differences. As we noted earlier, the Senate version includes $5.5 billion of competitive grants awarded at USDOT discretion, and $2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] passes? The funding priorities of the House and Senate versions exhibit marked differences. As we noted earlier, the Senate version includes $5.5 billion of competitive grants awarded at USDOT discretion, and $2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stimulus Update: Thoroughly Unstimulating &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/01/29/stimulus-update-nadlers-boost-and-the-senate-recovery-plan/#comment-6546</link>
		<dc:creator>Stimulus Update: Thoroughly Unstimulating &#171; Transbay Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2600#comment-6546</guid>
		<description>[...] is concerned, the discussion in the Senate has gone from bad to worse. Last week, we examined the transportation provisions included in the original Senate version; while that version included $2 billion allocated to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is concerned, the discussion in the Senate has gone from bad to worse. Last week, we examined the transportation provisions included in the original Senate version; while that version included $2 billion allocated to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elementaryfinance</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/01/29/stimulus-update-nadlers-boost-and-the-senate-recovery-plan/#comment-6529</link>
		<dc:creator>elementaryfinance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2600#comment-6529</guid>
		<description>Great detail.  I posted an exhaustive list of what is in the Stimulus if anybody is interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great detail.  I posted an exhaustive list of what is in the Stimulus if anybody is interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/01/29/stimulus-update-nadlers-boost-and-the-senate-recovery-plan/#comment-6527</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2600#comment-6527</guid>
		<description>[...] Nadler Amendment for Transit Clears While Amtrak Cuts Are Nixed (WSJ, Transbay Blog) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nadler Amendment for Transit Clears While Amtrak Cuts Are Nixed (WSJ, Transbay Blog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog &#187; Onward to the Senate</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2009/01/29/stimulus-update-nadlers-boost-and-the-senate-recovery-plan/#comment-6526</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog &#187; Onward to the Senate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2600#comment-6526</guid>
		<description>[...] bill allocating $3 billion for public transit was passed by a voice vote on the floor of the House. Transbay Blog reminds us, though, that it&#039;s no time to rest on our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bill allocating $3 billion for public transit was passed by a voice vote on the floor of the House. Transbay Blog reminds us, though, that it&#8217;s no time to rest on our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
