<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eight Years, Four Neighborhoods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transbayblog.com/2008/12/10/eight-years-four-neighborhoods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/12/10/eight-years-four-neighborhoods/</link>
	<description>Transportation and urban planning in the San Francisco Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/12/10/eight-years-four-neighborhoods/#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2151#comment-6416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Western&lt;/i&gt; Neighborhoods? Now that&#039;s just crazy talk! Too bad we really do have to do it...

For sure, there is still plenty of EN-related things to talk about, transit issues being one of them, though my guess is that EN implementation will far outlive this site. ;-) Mostly, I  was just surprised how quickly time flew by this year, but that&#039;s how things go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Western</i> Neighborhoods? Now that&#8217;s just crazy talk! Too bad we really do have to do it&#8230;</p>
<p>For sure, there is still plenty of EN-related things to talk about, transit issues being one of them, though my guess is that EN implementation will far outlive this site. ;-) Mostly, I  was just surprised how quickly time flew by this year, but that&#8217;s how things go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/12/10/eight-years-four-neighborhoods/#comment-6415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2151#comment-6415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now we can look forward to the comprehensive re-zoning of the Western Neighborhoods for TOD and increased density.

What?  Why are you looking at me like that?

Seriously though, Folks that already call these neighborhoods home took some serious sacrifices in exchange for some decent and many nominal concessions from the erector set.  That said almost everyone is behind at this stage.

I think you can still write valuable blog posts dealing with its implementation.  I think it&#039;s very likely the requirements this plan places on developers will be watered down further than that already have.  Plus, the revenue projected to come from the development is already acknowledged to be less than what the improved civic infrastructure will cost the city.  Somebody  needs to figure out how to make that difference and it&#039;d be great to hear about it when it happens.

Maybe also a post about how TEP cuts service in all of these neighborhoods while the EN plan projects significant increases in population density.

I agree with missiondweller:keep posting! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we can look forward to the comprehensive re-zoning of the Western Neighborhoods for TOD and increased density.</p>
<p>What?  Why are you looking at me like that?</p>
<p>Seriously though, Folks that already call these neighborhoods home took some serious sacrifices in exchange for some decent and many nominal concessions from the erector set.  That said almost everyone is behind at this stage.</p>
<p>I think you can still write valuable blog posts dealing with its implementation.  I think it&#8217;s very likely the requirements this plan places on developers will be watered down further than that already have.  Plus, the revenue projected to come from the development is already acknowledged to be less than what the improved civic infrastructure will cost the city.  Somebody  needs to figure out how to make that difference and it&#8217;d be great to hear about it when it happens.</p>
<p>Maybe also a post about how TEP cuts service in all of these neighborhoods while the EN plan projects significant increases in population density.</p>
<p>I agree with missiondweller:keep posting! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: missiondweller</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/12/10/eight-years-four-neighborhoods/#comment-6414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[missiondweller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbayblog.com/?p=2151#comment-6414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep posting. I recently discovered your site and love it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep posting. I recently discovered your site and love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

