Comments on: Planning for Climate Change

By: Squeezing the Sponge Dry « Transbay Blog

Squeezing the Sponge Dry « Transbay Blog — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:19:17 +0000

[...] officials are more than happy to heap praise in broad strokes upon the environmental credentials of AB 32, SB 375, and high-speed rail, all while signing off on the one-way drain of transit funds that are then [...]

By: SB 375 and AB 1358: Victory for Livability Legislation « Transbay Blog

SB 375 and AB 1358: Victory for Livability Legislation « Transbay Blog — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 05:49:41 +0000

[...] legislation” that we have been following, have both been signed into law. SB 375, the landmark bill that unites transportation, housing, and land use planning with CEQA reform, is an important step [...]

By: The Mismatch of California Planning « Transbay Blog

The Mismatch of California Planning « Transbay Blog — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:09:43 +0000

[...] of course, never the sacrosanct highway funds. For now, we will just leave it at this: crafting legislation that encourages smart growth is laudable, but entirely insufficient in isolation. If (when) transit [...]

By: Catching Up « Living in the O

Catching Up « Living in the O — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:19:55 +0000

[...] state still has no budget, and though the legislature just passed Steinberg’s landmark bill to encourage smart growth, the state may make this bill ineffective by gutting transportation [...]

By: Getting Somewhere on Land Use « Transbay Blog

Getting Somewhere on Land Use « Transbay Blog — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:29:08 +0000

[...] the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If you haven’t already done so, please read this earlier post for full details on SB [...]

By: SB 375 and AB 1358 Are on the Governor’s Desk « Transbay Blog

SB 375 and AB 1358 Are on the Governor’s Desk « Transbay Blog — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:52:24 +0000

[...] Transbay Blog « Planning for Climate Change [...]