<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complete Streets Act to Hit the State Senate Floor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/31/complete-streets-act-to-hit-the-state-senate-floor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/31/complete-streets-act-to-hit-the-state-senate-floor/</link>
	<description>Transportation and urban planning in the San Francisco Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:20:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streets Stimulus &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/31/complete-streets-act-to-hit-the-state-senate-floor/#comment-6471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Streets Stimulus &#171; Transbay Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=891#comment-6471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] increase transit ridership. The multimodal vision is similar to that embraced by California&#8217;s Complete Streets Act passed this year, but it would translate into more immediate [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increase transit ridership. The multimodal vision is similar to that embraced by California&#8217;s Complete Streets Act passed this year, but it would translate into more immediate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB 375 and AB 1358 Are on the Governor&#8217;s Desk &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/31/complete-streets-act-to-hit-the-state-senate-floor/#comment-5719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SB 375 and AB 1358 Are on the Governor&#8217;s Desk &#171; Transbay Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=891#comment-5719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 375 and AB 1358 Are on the Governor&#8217;s&#160;Desk  Remember AB 1358, the Complete Streets Act that we talked about several weeks ago? Well, it finally passed through the California legislature [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 375 and AB 1358 Are on the Governor&#8217;s&nbsp;Desk  Remember AB 1358, the Complete Streets Act that we talked about several weeks ago? Well, it finally passed through the California legislature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/31/complete-streets-act-to-hit-the-state-senate-floor/#comment-5541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=891#comment-5541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geez, Andy, you want inspired buildings &lt;i&gt;in addition to&lt;/i&gt; complete streets? Picky. ;-)

Seriously, though- Fruitvale I think they were going for a particular look, but I agree that a lot of these transit village type developments end up becoming a bit cookie cutter. Maybe the problem is that we insist on calling them &quot;villages,&quot; which in turn inspires lackluster design.

Like the South San Francisco BART transit village. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/30/BAG7QQ3PBD1.DTL&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Even John King&lt;/a&gt; managed to realize it was boring, to say the least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, Andy, you want inspired buildings <i>in addition to</i> complete streets? Picky. ;-)</p>
<p>Seriously, though- Fruitvale I think they were going for a particular look, but I agree that a lot of these transit village type developments end up becoming a bit cookie cutter. Maybe the problem is that we insist on calling them &#8220;villages,&#8221; which in turn inspires lackluster design.</p>
<p>Like the South San Francisco BART transit village. <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/30/BAG7QQ3PBD1.DTL" rel="nofollow">Even John King</a> managed to realize it was boring, to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/31/complete-streets-act-to-hit-the-state-senate-floor/#comment-5535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=891#comment-5535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it with idyllic street views slash recent projects and buildings painted in awful shades of beige, tan, brown, etc!! I saw the recent construction around the Fruitvale BART station for the first time the other day and it’s a horrible combination of all those colors. I guess it’s supposed to be easy on they eyes but IMO it’s hard to take buildings masquerading as earth very seriously. 

On a positive note the bill sounds great!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it with idyllic street views slash recent projects and buildings painted in awful shades of beige, tan, brown, etc!! I saw the recent construction around the Fruitvale BART station for the first time the other day and it’s a horrible combination of all those colors. I guess it’s supposed to be easy on they eyes but IMO it’s hard to take buildings masquerading as earth very seriously. </p>
<p>On a positive note the bill sounds great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

