<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Walkability, Density, and Transit Villages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/17/on-walkability-density-and-transit-villages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/17/on-walkability-density-and-transit-villages/</link>
	<description>Transportation and urban planning in the San Francisco Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planning to Conserve &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/17/on-walkability-density-and-transit-villages/#comment-6592</link>
		<dc:creator>Planning to Conserve &#171; Transbay Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=708#comment-6592</guid>
		<description>[...] lifestyle that is characterized by shorter trips on foot, bicycle, or transit. But building the right type of development in the right places is no automatic guarantee that we will stop building the wrong type in the wrong places. In order [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lifestyle that is characterized by shorter trips on foot, bicycle, or transit. But building the right type of development in the right places is no automatic guarantee that we will stop building the wrong type in the wrong places. In order [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streets Stimulus &#171; Transbay Blog</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/17/on-walkability-density-and-transit-villages/#comment-6470</link>
		<dc:creator>Streets Stimulus &#171; Transbay Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=708#comment-6470</guid>
		<description>[...] out of auto-oriented design. In the summer of 2008, the title of America&#8217;s most walkable city was bestowed upon San Francisco, and many of the city&#8217;s beloved neighborhoods deserve the title. Other neighborhoods &#8212; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out of auto-oriented design. In the summer of 2008, the title of America&#8217;s most walkable city was bestowed upon San Francisco, and many of the city&#8217;s beloved neighborhoods deserve the title. Other neighborhoods &#8212; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/17/on-walkability-density-and-transit-villages/#comment-5487</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=708#comment-5487</guid>
		<description>Nick, that&#039;d be great, looking forward to reading your reports on that.

I hope you enjoy your trip to SF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, that&#8217;d be great, looking forward to reading your reports on that.</p>
<p>I hope you enjoy your trip to SF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Bastian</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/17/on-walkability-density-and-transit-villages/#comment-5486</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Bastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=708#comment-5486</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric, the overlay districts appear to be slightly different in Phoenix and Tempe. I have 2 different reports mentioning some of the proposed changes and will try to write about them in the near future. The Tempe study does talk a lot about affordable housing and it is an element that I hope they take advantage of. I am trying to finish a bunch of stuff this weekend as I head out to your fine city tomorrow! I am excited to ride the BART directly to my hotel. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric, the overlay districts appear to be slightly different in Phoenix and Tempe. I have 2 different reports mentioning some of the proposed changes and will try to write about them in the near future. The Tempe study does talk a lot about affordable housing and it is an element that I hope they take advantage of. I am trying to finish a bunch of stuff this weekend as I head out to your fine city tomorrow! I am excited to ride the BART directly to my hotel. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/17/on-walkability-density-and-transit-villages/#comment-5485</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=708#comment-5485</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick, thanks for writing in about Phoenix. One criticism of TOD and smart growth in general is that it can cause gentrification or create economically stratified neighborhoods, but the &quot;density bonus&quot; you mentioned is one tool not only for getting more housing immediately adjacent to rail, but also in creating communities with a mix of income levels.

I&#039;m glad to hear that Phoenix/Tempe is taking TOD seriously, because it will help to make the new light rail line all the more popular. If you happen to come back and check this comment again, I&#039;d be interested to hear what sort of zoning changes, if any are required, that your area is making in the vicinity of the new stations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick, thanks for writing in about Phoenix. One criticism of TOD and smart growth in general is that it can cause gentrification or create economically stratified neighborhoods, but the &#8220;density bonus&#8221; you mentioned is one tool not only for getting more housing immediately adjacent to rail, but also in creating communities with a mix of income levels.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to hear that Phoenix/Tempe is taking TOD seriously, because it will help to make the new light rail line all the more popular. If you happen to come back and check this comment again, I&#8217;d be interested to hear what sort of zoning changes, if any are required, that your area is making in the vicinity of the new stations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Bastian</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/07/17/on-walkability-density-and-transit-villages/#comment-5484</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Bastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=708#comment-5484</guid>
		<description>The walkscore info is great but your discussion of TOD&#039;s is VERY interesting to me. Here in the PHX area, they have an opportunity to make some amazing changes in the mind set of some of our communities. During the developmental planning of our new light rail system, the city of Tempe hired a firm from the bay area to discuss TOD planning. We are making progress in allowing greater density and planning easier access to light rail stations. There is talk of approving even higher density for projects that will incorporate affordable housing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The walkscore info is great but your discussion of TOD&#8217;s is VERY interesting to me. Here in the PHX area, they have an opportunity to make some amazing changes in the mind set of some of our communities. During the developmental planning of our new light rail system, the city of Tempe hired a firm from the bay area to discuss TOD planning. We are making progress in allowing greater density and planning easier access to light rail stations. There is talk of approving even higher density for projects that will incorporate affordable housing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
