<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MTA Board Selects Central Subway Alignment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/</link>
	<description>Transportation and urban planning in the San Francisco Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-5033</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-5033</guid>
		<description>Funny you should suggest that, Whole Wheat Toast. As I am reading your comment, I am sitting in a coffee shop after having just gotten kicked off the T due to a malfunction. Allegedly, bus substitution is on the way. It&#039;s been about 15 minutes since that promise was hastily offered, and no bus has yet materialized.

EDIT #1: Just three minutes after posting this comment, a bus arrived! Not great, but not bad; it remains to be seen how often buses will arrive until trains can run normally again.

EDIT #2: Nine minutes after posting the last edit, a replacement bus arrives at the same time as the train. My cynicism is unwarranted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should suggest that, Whole Wheat Toast. As I am reading your comment, I am sitting in a coffee shop after having just gotten kicked off the T due to a malfunction. Allegedly, bus substitution is on the way. It&#8217;s been about 15 minutes since that promise was hastily offered, and no bus has yet materialized.</p>
<p>EDIT #1: Just three minutes after posting this comment, a bus arrived! Not great, but not bad; it remains to be seen how often buses will arrive until trains can run normally again.</p>
<p>EDIT #2: Nine minutes after posting the last edit, a replacement bus arrives at the same time as the train. My cynicism is unwarranted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whole Wheat Toast</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-5030</link>
		<dc:creator>Whole Wheat Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-5030</guid>
		<description>w00t! finally! now if they just discontinue the T for the time being and replace it with the 15 and restore the T when the central subway opens...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>w00t! finally! now if they just discontinue the T for the time being and replace it with the 15 and restore the T when the central subway opens&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-4919</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-4919</guid>
		<description>I think that Muni should consider a shallower construction method. The station at Market Street should be located just above the current Muni Metro station as opposed to several stories underground. The faregates could be located in the platform level, as they do in many of the New York subway stations. I&#039;m also ticked that the capacity will be very limited due to the shortened platform. We are planning for the future and having short platforms sounds like a bad idea. It will cost millions to extend platforms later, and adding extra trains will just cause congestion. Also, how much is the extension down 4th Street needed? The bus lanes seem to be pretty effective with the extra wide one-way street. Perhaps the subway could just end at Market, and the money saved can be used to build an extension to North Beach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Muni should consider a shallower construction method. The station at Market Street should be located just above the current Muni Metro station as opposed to several stories underground. The faregates could be located in the platform level, as they do in many of the New York subway stations. I&#8217;m also ticked that the capacity will be very limited due to the shortened platform. We are planning for the future and having short platforms sounds like a bad idea. It will cost millions to extend platforms later, and adding extra trains will just cause congestion. Also, how much is the extension down 4th Street needed? The bus lanes seem to be pretty effective with the extra wide one-way street. Perhaps the subway could just end at Market, and the money saved can be used to build an extension to North Beach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-4900</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-4900</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good point. I just checked, and 1st and Mish to ...

3rd &amp; Howard, 2400&#039;
Stockton &amp; Post, 3200&#039;

10 mins, more or less -- the most conservative rule of thumb for the distance most folks will talk to/from a train station. I know I&#039;d certainly walk rather than transfer and pay a separate fare. You may be right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good point. I just checked, and 1st and Mish to &#8230;</p>
<p>3rd &amp; Howard, 2400&#8242;<br />
Stockton &amp; Post, 3200&#8242;</p>
<p>10 mins, more or less &#8212; the most conservative rule of thumb for the distance most folks will talk to/from a train station. I know I&#8217;d certainly walk rather than transfer and pay a separate fare. You may be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-4899</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-4899</guid>
		<description>Oh, I think it&#039;s basically a given that DTX will severely cut down on N ridership in this stretch, but what I&#039;m more interested in is seeing the extent to which people would be willing to walk from the DTX to destinations that the MTA assumes that riders will use the CS to access (i.e. not FiDi as much). 

The MTA predicts that 89% of the activity at the 4th/King platform will be connected to Caltrain transfers, so unlike the other stations, we&#039;re looking at a regional ridership. These riders will have already paid (or will pay) Caltrain fare, and so I wonder how many people would rather pay just one fare and just walk further? For many destinations, particularly those just east of the CS alignment, the walk would be about 10 minutes from either Transbay or 4th/King Caltrain stations. Is that just close enough to encourage skipping the T altogether? 

This will likely depend on how well the T is operated, and maybe I&#039;m inserting my own sort of frugal bias here. I don&#039;t really know one way or the other, but I would like to see some honest projections.

This is yet another reason why the viability of this project only increases as it is extended into and past Washington Square. The destinations currently served by the CS are geographically close enough to each other that the time savings just aren&#039;t that apparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I think it&#8217;s basically a given that DTX will severely cut down on N ridership in this stretch, but what I&#8217;m more interested in is seeing the extent to which people would be willing to walk from the DTX to destinations that the MTA assumes that riders will use the CS to access (i.e. not FiDi as much). </p>
<p>The MTA predicts that 89% of the activity at the 4th/King platform will be connected to Caltrain transfers, so unlike the other stations, we&#8217;re looking at a regional ridership. These riders will have already paid (or will pay) Caltrain fare, and so I wonder how many people would rather pay just one fare and just walk further? For many destinations, particularly those just east of the CS alignment, the walk would be about 10 minutes from either Transbay or 4th/King Caltrain stations. Is that just close enough to encourage skipping the T altogether? </p>
<p>This will likely depend on how well the T is operated, and maybe I&#8217;m inserting my own sort of frugal bias here. I don&#8217;t really know one way or the other, but I would like to see some honest projections.</p>
<p>This is yet another reason why the viability of this project only increases as it is extended into and past Washington Square. The destinations currently served by the CS are geographically close enough to each other that the time savings just aren&#8217;t that apparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-4898</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-4898</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m sure there would be some, I just doubt it would be very many. What DTX will cannibalize is the N-Judah extension.

I agree re: 4th &amp; Brannan. Putting the portal under the freeway was by and large a good move, although I worry about the 4th Street off-ramp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m sure there would be some, I just doubt it would be very many. What DTX will cannibalize is the N-Judah extension.</p>
<p>I agree re: 4th &amp; Brannan. Putting the portal under the freeway was by and large a good move, although I worry about the 4th Street off-ramp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>Steve, are you feeling under the weather today? ;-) 

DTX serves a different market, and the projections weren&#039;t all that clear on how many riders are going where, but the figures definitely include riders who would switch over to Caltrain if the extension is built. Not to mention the fact that many people bound for SoMa or Union Square (once DTX is built) would rather just pay one fare and walk.

I&#039;m not sure if they&#039;ve considered moving the Powell boarding zone, but hopefully they have, as it&#039;s the obvious way to help at least a little bit.

I agree that moving the Chinatown station a block north (and also introducing the surface station at Brannan) were both good moves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, are you feeling under the weather today? ;-) </p>
<p>DTX serves a different market, and the projections weren&#8217;t all that clear on how many riders are going where, but the figures definitely include riders who would switch over to Caltrain if the extension is built. Not to mention the fact that many people bound for SoMa or Union Square (once DTX is built) would rather just pay one fare and walk.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if they&#8217;ve considered moving the Powell boarding zone, but hopefully they have, as it&#8217;s the obvious way to help at least a little bit.</p>
<p>I agree that moving the Chinatown station a block north (and also introducing the surface station at Brannan) were both good moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-4895</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-4895</guid>
		<description>Far be it from me to defend the Central Subway, but DTX will serve a different market (the FiDi, not Union Square).

I hadn&#039;t seen the 4 1/2-minute figure. I take it that&#039;s an average? There is one easy way Muni could mitigate, if only slightly: move the outbound boarding area at Powell to mid-platform, opposite inbound boarding.

And as long as I&#039;m defending the CS (WTF? I guess if it&#039;s a fait accompli, may as well just accept it), pushing it a block farther north is a bigger deal than the distance (~300&#039;) would suggest. That cuts the walk from the busiest corner in Chinatown (Stockton and Pacific) by a third and goes a long way toward closing the psychological gap between the subway and North Beach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far be it from me to defend the Central Subway, but DTX will serve a different market (the FiDi, not Union Square).</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t seen the 4 1/2-minute figure. I take it that&#8217;s an average? There is one easy way Muni could mitigate, if only slightly: move the outbound boarding area at Powell to mid-platform, opposite inbound boarding.</p>
<p>And as long as I&#8217;m defending the CS (WTF? I guess if it&#8217;s a fait accompli, may as well just accept it), pushing it a block farther north is a bigger deal than the distance (~300&#8242;) would suggest. That cuts the walk from the busiest corner in Chinatown (Stockton and Pacific) by a third and goes a long way toward closing the psychological gap between the subway and North Beach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-4894</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-4894</guid>
		<description>An anti-rail bias may well be the motivation behind this comment, but the FTA, perhaps inadvertently, hit on a valid point. The Caltrain analysis is inadequate, particularly in its willingness to shrug off the fact that the DTX two blocks away would render this alignment redundant for regional commuters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An anti-rail bias may well be the motivation behind this comment, but the FTA, perhaps inadvertently, hit on a valid point. The Caltrain analysis is inadequate, particularly in its willingness to shrug off the fact that the DTX two blocks away would render this alignment redundant for regional commuters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Overhead Wire</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/19/mta-board-selects-central-subway-alignment/#comment-4893</link>
		<dc:creator>The Overhead Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-4893</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t take much stock in the making the case section in that the FTA has taken to trashing every rail project that comes along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t take much stock in the making the case section in that the FTA has taken to trashing every rail project that comes along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
