<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good News for Mission Street</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/03/good-news-for-mission-street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/03/good-news-for-mission-street/</link>
	<description>Transportation and urban planning in the San Francisco Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zig</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/03/good-news-for-mission-street/#comment-5790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-5790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An idea of how to manage Mission Street could come from Seattle

Cars should be forced to make right turns off of Mission St every two blocks which could be coordinated with  bus stops 

Along with signal preemption this could really speed things up and discourage cruising Mission Street by cars and reduce to some current conflicts with parkers

Buses would no longer get stuck in their current bus stops

Conceivably stops could even be in the middle lanes in this arrangement if you really wanted to take the street for buses.  All cars are forced to make a right turn, the bus cleans the intersection and the stop is in the middle  of the street blocked from traffic]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An idea of how to manage Mission Street could come from Seattle</p>
<p>Cars should be forced to make right turns off of Mission St every two blocks which could be coordinated with  bus stops </p>
<p>Along with signal preemption this could really speed things up and discourage cruising Mission Street by cars and reduce to some current conflicts with parkers</p>
<p>Buses would no longer get stuck in their current bus stops</p>
<p>Conceivably stops could even be in the middle lanes in this arrangement if you really wanted to take the street for buses.  All cars are forced to make a right turn, the bus cleans the intersection and the stop is in the middle  of the street blocked from traffic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zig</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/03/good-news-for-mission-street/#comment-5789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-5789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric,

Are these improvements (beyond service) being reveled one line at a time?

When I personally read the initial report and service changes proposed for the J line I was disappointed.   Basically with no signal preemption and reduced stops and with the idea of running the J to SFSU our service was going to be much worse

Is there more to come?  I am getting very tired of sitting at stop lights and stopping at stop signs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>Are these improvements (beyond service) being reveled one line at a time?</p>
<p>When I personally read the initial report and service changes proposed for the J line I was disappointed.   Basically with no signal preemption and reduced stops and with the idea of running the J to SFSU our service was going to be much worse</p>
<p>Is there more to come?  I am getting very tired of sitting at stop lights and stopping at stop signs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/03/good-news-for-mission-street/#comment-4216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-4216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick: enforcement of double parking is also at least partly on the way (hopefully), thanks to this &lt;a href=&quot;http://transbayblog.com/2008/01/04/pilot-program-for-bus-only-lane-cameras/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pilot program&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick: enforcement of double parking is also at least partly on the way (hopefully), thanks to this <a href="http://transbayblog.com/2008/01/04/pilot-program-for-bus-only-lane-cameras/" rel="nofollow">pilot program</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick/295bus</title>
		<link>http://transbayblog.com/2008/02/03/good-news-for-mission-street/#comment-4215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick/295bus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transbay.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-4215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is good--now let&#039;s see if we can move on to the hard stuff, like signal preemption and enforcement of double parking laws.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good&#8211;now let&#8217;s see if we can move on to the hard stuff, like signal preemption and enforcement of double parking laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

